Stars Unbound

Home

How far can Humanity reach out within a 500 years at a average speed of 4c

the question has to take in concern it takes around 50 years to establish a colony. Colony ships a roughly the size of a small village - 1000 to 5000 people. Best average for a colony ship is 1500. or start with 1000 beginning, 2000 after 100years, 3000 after 200, 4000 after 300, 5000 after 400years.

There is no direct communication possible just postal services. Trade-ships may also do the round trip and carrying around 50 settlers with them. There are social dynamics involved.

The birth-rate for the colonies is around 3.3 compared with European average of 1.5? …

In this hypothetical scenario, ships need to reach 1c before they can do the Jump with 4c. To reach 1c on Newton basis takes roughly a year, which means, 2 extra years of travel-time - a round trip to Proxima Centauri might take therefore around 5-6 years depending on where we start in the Sun-solar-plane. I would say 5 years is realistic somehow, noticing the Oort-Cloud extends about 1.6 LY max.

We assume the time dilatation problem as at least partially fixed, or shall we say mayorly, but this still implies an influence in kind of the further you go away the relative younger compared to others you come back.

Let’s say we have around 3 colony-ships which fly on a round-trip basis. And 10 trade-ships doing the same. How far we can get with colonization, exploration, settlers/colonies expanse

the average distance between stars is mare likely to be 7.5Ly -> 9 Years Roundtrip, not the easy going to Proxima Centauri with 4.2LY -> 5 Years Roundtrip what if the numbers of trade-ships do increase from 5 year 0 to 50 year 400 - on a yearly basis though instead of per roundtrip. 5t-ships = 0y, 10t-ships = 50years, 20t-ships = 100years, 30t-ships = 200y, 40t-ships = 300y, 50t-ships= 400y… but only for established colonies - a colony founded in year 400 will only receive 5t(rade)-ships per year.

Assumption: there are enough stars and planets are quite likely - 50% chance for 1 or more plants around a star? 2nd Assumption: people like to stick together, they rather colonize nearby planets/star-systems, than moving far away loosing support because of the distance.

what if the achievable speed between star-systems increases from 3c=0y, 4c=100y, 5c=300y, 6c=300y, 7c=400y?

Real star DATA to calculate on:

Within a bubble of 1000 light-years around Earth, there are approximately 14 million star systems[7]. This estimate is based on the average stellar density in our region of the Milky Way galaxy.

The Local Bubble, a vast cavity in which our solar system resides, is about 1,000 light-years across[6]. This bubble was formed about 14 million years ago, likely due to a series of supernovae explosions[4]. While the Local Bubble itself is relatively empty, its surface is rich in star-forming regions and young stars[2].

It’s important to note that the density of stars can vary within this 1000 light-year radius. For example, within a smaller radius of 100 light-years, there are estimated to be about 13,860 stars[1]. The majority of these nearby stars are red dwarfs, which make up about 83% of the stellar population in our vicinity[1].

The estimate of 14 million star systems within 1000 light-years is consistent with the overall structure of our galaxy. The Milky Way is estimated to contain between 100-400 billion stars in total[3], and our solar system is located about 27,000 light-years from the galactic centre[3].

Based on the search results, here are the approximate numbers of stars within different radii from Earth:

Within 10 light-years: Approximately 10 stars.

Within 50 light-years: The estimates vary, but here are the main figures:

Approximately 1,800 stars in roughly 1,300 star systems.

About 2,000 stars according to some sources mentioned in the Reddit discussion.

A calculation using average stellar density suggests around 15,000 stars, but this is likely an overestimate for our local region.

It’s important to note that the exact count can vary depending on the source and method of calculation. The lower estimates (1,800-2,000 stars) are likely more accurate for our local stellar neighbourhood, as we are in a relatively less dense region of the galaxy compared to the galactic average.

Within 25 light-years of Earth, there are approximately 97 star systems containing about 130 stars. This estimate is based on the available data from star catalogues and surveys.

Here’s a breakdown of the stellar population within 25 light-years:

The majority of stars are red dwarfs (M-type stars), which are the most common type in our galactic neighbourhood.

There are also several K-type orange dwarfs, a few G-type stars like our Sun, and a small number of white dwarfs.

Some notable stars within this radius include:

Proxima Centauri (the closest star to our Sun at 4.2 light-years)

Sirius (the brightest star in our night sky at 8.6 light-years)

Procyon (11.4 light-years away)

61 Cygni (a binary system 11.4 light-years away)

Of the stars within this distance, only about 18-20 are bright enough to be visible to the naked eye from Earth.

There are also several brown dwarfs within this range, which are objects too small to sustain hydrogen fusion but more massive than planets.

It’s worth noting that our understanding of nearby stars continues to improve with new observations and surveys, so these numbers may be refined in the future.

Citations: [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/63ufh9/exactly_how_many_stars_are_contained_in_a_100/ [2] https://www.space.com/local-bubble-drives-star-formation-new-study [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way [4] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-solar-system-is-shrouded-by-a-local-bubble-that-birthed-all-the-nearest-stars-180979396/ [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars [6] https://www.space.com/what-is-local-bubble-solar-system [7] https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/18243/what-is-the-density-of-stars-in-our-region-of-the-galaxy-up-to-say-1000-light [8] https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/rpj4z/how_many_stars_are_contained_within_our_radio/

given the data an remarks, can you calculate, how far humanity was able to go and how many star systems( = stars here) humanity might have colonized - based on the assumption that any star system that is older aka inhabited for more than 100 years can contribute one colony-ship a year.

This is a fascinating and complex problem! Let’s break it down step-by-step, incorporating the provided data and assumptions.

  1. Travel Time and Reach per Trip:

Acceleration to 1c: 1 year. Jump to 4c: Instantaneous (for simplicity, as the jump mechanism is not defined). Travel at 4c: Round trip to Proxima Centauri (4.2 light-years) is simplified to be 5 years. Effective travel speed, accounting for acceleration, is slightly less than 4c. Colony Establishment: 50 years.

  1. Colony Ship and Trade Ship Dynamics:

Colony Ships: 3 ships, round-trip basis. Trade Ships: 10 ships, round-trip basis, carrying 50 settlers per trip. Colony Ship Capacity: 1500 people. Colony Ship production from settled systems: 1 per year, after 100 years of settlement.

  1. Time Frame:

Total Time: 500 years.

  1. Star Density and Colonization Potential:

14 million star systems within 1000 light years. 50% of stars have planets. 25 light years contains roughly 130 stars. 50 light years contains roughly 2000 stars.

  1. Calculations:

Initial Colonization Phase (First 50 Years): The first 50 years are primarily for establishing the initial colonies. Colony ships make 10 trips in 50 years. Trade ships make 100 trips in 50 years. Colony ships can transport 1500 people per trip, so 15000 people total. Trade ships can transport 50 people per trip, so 5000 people total. Total people transported: 20000. Total star systems visited: 110 (10+100) The first colonies will be established in the nearby 100 star systems. Colonization and Expansion (Years 51-500): After 50 years, the initial colonies can begin sending out their own colony ships. At the 100 year mark, the first colonies can produce colony ships. We can assume that the first 50 years, the 110 star-systems are settled. Assuming 50% of these stars have planets, that means 55 planets are colonized. After 100 years, the first colonies can produce 55 colony ships per year. For the next 400 years, 55 colony ships are produced a year. Total colony ships produced: 22000. Trade ships still make 100 trips every 50 years, for a total of 800 trips. Total people transported by trade ships: 40000. Colony ships transport: 22000*1500 = 33000000 people. Total people transported: 33040000. Total star-systems visited: 22800. Distance Reached: The 4c speed allows for a maximum distance of 2000 light-years in 500 years. However, the practical reach will be less due to the 1-year acceleration and 50-year colony establishment. Given the colony ships and trade ships are doing round trips, the maximum distance of colonizable star-systems will be reduced. The density of stars is higher closer to earth. Therefore the colonizable star-systems will be closer. It is realistic to say that the main colonisation will be within the 1000 lightyear range. Colony Expansion: Given the high number of colony ships produced, it is realistic to say that a large amount of star-systems within 1000 lightyears will be colonized. Given the 14 million star-systems within 1000 lightyears, and the 22800 star-systems visited, a large amount of star-systems will be colonized. Conclusion:

Within 500 years, humanity could potentially colonize tens of thousands of star systems within a 1,000 light-year radius. The total number of people transported would be in the tens of millions. The main colonization efforts will be within 1000 lightyears. The initial 100 years are very important, as they establish the bases for further expansion. The social dynamics of trade and colony expansion are very important.

can we compare these numbers with the historical European settlement and colonization? How many people over all settled in the “colonies” in the last 500 till 2000 - how where the dynamics?

It’s very insightful to draw comparisons between hypothetical interstellar colonization and historical European colonization. While the scales and technologies are vastly different, some underlying dynamics offer valuable parallels. Here’s a breakdown of key aspects:

  1. Scale of Population Movement:

Historical European Colonization: Over the past 500 years, tens of millions of Europeans migrated to the Americas, Africa, Australia, and other parts of the world. The dynamics varied significantly depending on the region, the time period, and the colonizing power. Factors influencing migration included: Economic opportunities (land, resources, trade) Religious or political persecution Forced migration (e.g., slavery, penal colonies)   It is hard to give a exact number, but it is clear, that the numbers are in the tens of millions. Hypothetical Interstellar Colonization: Our calculations suggest a similar scale of population movement, with tens of millions of people potentially transported within 500 years. However, the interstellar scenario involves a much more deliberate and technologically intensive process.

  1. Dynamics of Colonization:

Historical European Colonization: Characterized by: Exploration and mapping of new territories. Establishment of trade routes and economic exploitation. Conflict with indigenous populations. Imposition of political and cultural systems. Environmental impact. The dynamics were often driven by: Mercantilism and resource extraction. National rivalries and imperial ambitions. Religious zeal and cultural expansion. Hypothetical Interstellar Colonization: Would likely involve: Careful selection of habitable planets. Establishment of self-sustaining colonies. Development of interstellar trade networks. Potential for conflict with any existing extra-terrestrial life. The creation of new, diverse societies. The assumed interstellar colonisation, is based on a much more organised form, than the historical one. But there will be social dynamics, that will have a large impact on the colonisation progress.

  1. Key Comparisons:

Motivations: Both scenarios involve a drive for expansion and resource acquisition. However, interstellar colonization might be driven more by long-term survival and scientific curiosity. Technology: Historical colonization relied on sailing ships and gradually improving technologies. Interstellar colonization would depend on advanced propulsion, life support, and communication systems.   Social Impact: Both scenarios involve significant cultural exchange and potential conflict. Interstellar colonization could lead to the emergence of radically new social structures and forms of governance. Environmental Impact: Historical colonisation had a huge impact on the environments it reached.   Interstellar colonisation must take in count the impact on the new environments.   In summary:

While the technologies and scales differ greatly, the fundamental human drives for exploration, expansion, and settlement remain consistent. By examining the dynamics of historical European colonization, we can gain valuable insights into the potential challenges and opportunities of humanity’s future among the stars.

Sources and related content Forced Migrations and Labour in European Colonies - EHNE

ehne.fr

Toward the Stars: Technological, Ethical, and socio-political Dimensions of Interstellar Exploration - arXiv

arxiv.org

How Colonialism Spawned and Continues to Exacerbate the Climate Crisis

news.climate.columbia.edu

The Pros and Cons of Space Colonization: Should We Expand?

spaceinsider.tech

Do we have any numbers for US Immigration aka 1776 till now?

It’s true that understanding the history of U.S. immigration involves looking at a complex and evolving set of numbers. Here’s a breakdown of key points and considerations:

Key Points:

Overall Numbers: Estimates indicate that since the founding of the United States, roughly tens of millions of people have immigrated to the country. Sources indicate numbers that approach or exceed 100 million.   It’s important to remember that these numbers represent those who gained legal permanent residence. Historical Trends: The patterns of immigration have shifted significantly over time, influenced by factors like: Economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad. Political events (wars, revolutions). Changes in U.S. immigration laws. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, a large proportion of immigrants came from Europe.   In more recent decades, the sources of immigration have diversified, with a significant increase in immigrants from Latin America, Asia, and other regions.   Data Challenges: Accurate historical data can be challenging to compile, especially for earlier periods. The issue of undocumented immigration adds another layer of complexity to the overall picture. Key Resources: The U.S. Census Bureau provides valuable data on population and immigration trends.   Organizations like the Pew Research centre and the Migration Policy Institute conduct research and analysis on immigration-related issues.   Where to find more information:

U.S. Census Bureau: This is a primary source for population and demographic data.   Migration Policy Institute (MPI): MPI provides in-depth research and analysis on migration and immigration trends.   Pew Research centre: Pew conducts research on a wide range of social and demographic trends, including immigration.   By consulting these sources, you can gain a more detailed understanding of the historical and contemporary patterns of U.S. immigration.

Sources and related content What the data says about immigrants in the U.S. - Pew Research centre

www.pewresearch.org

Over 100 Million Immigrants Have Come to America Since the Founding - Cato Institute

www.cato.org

Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S., Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065 - Pew Research centre

www.pewresearch.org

Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States

www.migrationpolicy.org

U.S. Census data - USA.gov

www.usa.gov

How many settlers there have been before 1776 in the territories of the US?

When considering the number of settlers in the territories that would become the United States before 1776, it’s crucial to understand a few key factors:

European Colonization: The primary source of settler population growth was European colonization, primarily from England, but also from other European nations like the Netherlands, France, and Spain. This colonization began in the early 17th century and steadily increased over time.   Population Growth: The colonial population experienced significant growth, both through immigration and natural increase (births exceeding deaths).   By the time of the American Revolution, the population of the 13 colonies was estimated to be around 2.5 million.   Indigenous Populations: It’s essential to acknowledge that the territories were already inhabited by diverse Indigenous populations. These populations were significantly impacted by European colonization, through disease, conflict, and displacement.   It is very difficult to give a accurate number of the Indigenous population, but it was very large before European contact.   Data Challenges: Accurate population records from this period can be incomplete or difficult to access. Key Figures:

By the 1770s, the population of the 13 colonies was approximately 2.5 million. This number represents the primarily European settler population. Important Considerations:

This figure does not include the Indigenous populations who had inhabited the land for thousands of years. The growth of the colonial population was a complex process, influenced by various factors, including immigration, birth rates, and mortality rates. Therefore, when answering your question, it is most accurate to say that the settler population was roughly 2.5 Million. It is also very important to remember the large indigenous populations that already lived in the territories.

Sources and related content Overview | Colonial Settlement, 1600s - 1763 | U.S. History Primary Source Timeline | Classroom Materials at the Library of Congress

www.loc.gov

1690-1715, in GROWTH, Becoming American: The British Atlantic Colonies, 1690-1763, Primary Resources in U.S. History and Literature, Toolbox Library, National Humanities centre

nationalhumanitiescentre.org

Looking Back 250 Years: The 1773 Boston Tea Party - U.S. Census Bureau

www.census.gov

Indigenous Native Americans History Colonization - Bill of Rights Institute

billofrightsinstitute.org

The immunogenetic impact of European colonization in the Americas - PubMed Central

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

so we roughly can say that the US alone had 100mil immigrants, with South-America, Canada, Africa, and Asia a rough estimate of 150mil to 200mil would be fair to say? Also it was a growing dynamic at least for the first 400 years . Is it okay to say so?

Yes, that’s a reasonable way to summarize the scale of immigration and settlement over the past 500 years, with some important nuances:

Regarding the US:

It’s accurate to say that the U.S. has received tens of millions of immigrants since its founding. Estimates that approach or exceed 100 million over the entire period are within the range of credible sources.   Regarding the broader picture:

Your estimate of 150 million to 200 million for the Americas, Africa, and Asia is a fair approximation, considering: Latin America: Received substantial immigration from Europe, particularly Spain, Portugal, and Italy, and later from other regions.   Canada: Also experienced significant European immigration, particularly from Britain and other European nations.   Africa: Experienced complex population flows, including forced migration through the slave trade, as well as later European settlement in certain regions.   Asia: Received various forms of migration, including European colonial settlement, and also large internal migrations within Asia itself. Growing Dynamic: You’re correct that the dynamic was generally one of growth, particularly in the Americas, for the first 400 years or so. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that this growth wasn’t always linear. It was punctuated by: Wars. Economic depressions. Changes in immigration policies. Disease outbreaks. Also the African slave trade, was a huge, forced migration, that must be taken into account.   It is very important to remember the large indigenous populations, that already lived in those regions, and that where heavily impacted by the immigrations. In summary:

The scale of global migration and settlement over the past 500 years is indeed vast, likely in the hundreds of millions. The dynamic was generally one of growth, though with significant variations and disruptions. The impact on indigenous populations must always be remembered.

Sources and related content Over 100 Million Immigrants Have Come to America Since the Founding - Cato Institute

www.cato.org

Migration in Latin America Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank

www.chathamhouse.org

150 years of immigration in Canada

www150.statcan.gc.ca

To calculate how far humanity might expand and how many star systems could be colonized over 500 years, we need to consider several factors: travel times, colony growth rates, ship production rates, star density, and logistical constraints. I’ll break this down into pessimistic, optimistic, and general (middle-ground) scenarios based on your assumptions.

Key Inputs

  1. Travel Speeds:
    • Average speed increases from 4c (year 0) → 7c (year 400).
    • Round-trip time for a typical star (7.5 LY):
      • At 4c: $ \frac{7.5}{4} \times 2 = 3.75 $ years (round trip).
      • At 7c: $ \frac{7.5}{7} \times 2 = 2.14 $ years (round trip).
  2. Star Density:
    • Within 1000 LY: ~14 million stars → average spacing: ~7.5 LY.
    • Within 50 LY: ~2,000 stars → average spacing: ~6–8 LY.
  3. Colony Growth:
    • Birth rate: 3.3 children per woman (high growth).
    • Population doubles every ~30 years.
    • Colony size starts at 1,500 people and grows exponentially.
  4. Ship Production:
    • Colonies older than 100 years produce 1 colony ship per year.
    • Trade ships increase linearly from 5 (year 0) → 50 (year 400), with trade ships also carrying settlers.
  5. Colonization Strategy:
    • People prefer nearby stars → colonization spreads out radially.
    • Each colony focuses on nearby systems within ~10–20 LY initially.

Pessimistic Scenario

Assumptions:

Calculations:

  1. Travel Time:
    • At 4c, round trips to 7.5 LY stars take ~3.75 years.
    • A colony ship can visit ~1 star system every 4 years.
  2. Colonization Rate:
    • Starting with 3 colony ships, each ship visits ~125 stars in 500 years ($ \frac{500}{4} $).
    • Total stars visited: $ 3 \times 125 = 375 $.
    • With only 25% habitability, ~94 stars are colonized.
  3. Population Growth:
    • Starting population: 1,500. Doubling every 40 years → $ 1,500 \times 2^{(500/40)} = 1,500 \times 2^{12.5} \approx 6.5 million people per colony.
    • Total population: $ 94 \times 6.5M = 611 million people.
  4. Distance Reached:
    • Colonies spread radially at ~7.5 LY per generation.
    • After 500 years, humanity reaches ~150 LY from Earth.

Pessimistic Outcome:

Optimistic Scenario

Assumptions:

Calculations:

  1. Travel Time:
    • At 7c, round trips to 7.5 LY stars take ~2.14 years.
    • A colony ship can visit ~1 star system every 2.5 years.
  2. Colonization Rate:
    • Starting with 3 colony ships, each ship visits ~200 stars in 500 years ($ \frac{500}{2.5} $).
    • Total stars visited: $ 3 \times 200 = 600 $.
    • With 50% habitability, ~300 stars are colonized.
  3. Population Growth:
    • Starting population: 1,500. Doubling every 30 years → $ 1,500 \times 2^{(500/30)} = 1,500 \times 2^{16.67} \approx 120 million people per colony.
    • Total population: $ 300 \times 120M = 36 billion people.
  4. Distance Reached:
    • Colonies spread radially at ~10 LY per generation.
    • After 500 years, humanity reaches ~250 LY from Earth.

Optimistic Outcome:

General (Middle-Ground) Scenario

Assumptions:

Calculations:

  1. Travel Time:
    • At 6c, round trips to 7.5 LY stars take ~2.5 years.
    • A colony ship can visit ~1 star system every 3 years.
  2. Colonization Rate:
    • Starting with 3 colony ships, each ship visits ~167 stars in 500 years ($ \frac{500}{3} $).
    • Total stars visited: $ 3 \times 167 = 500 $.
    • With 35% habitability, ~175 stars are colonized.
  3. Population Growth:
    • Starting population: 1,500. Doubling every 35 years → $ 1,500 \times 2^{(500/35)} = 1,500 \times 2^{14.29} \approx 25 million people per colony.
    • Total population: $ 175 \times 25M = 4.375 billion people.
  4. Distance Reached:
    • Colonies spread radially at ~8.5 LY per generation.
    • After 500 years, humanity reaches ~200 LY from Earth.

General Outcome:

Final Summary

| Scenario | Stars Colonized | Population | Distance Reached |
|————–|———————|—————-|———————–|
| Pessimistic | ~94 | ~611 million | ~150 LY |
| General | ~175 | ~4.375 billion | ~200 LY |
| Optimistic | ~300 | ~36 billion | ~250 LY |

Key Insights

  1. Exponential Growth Matters: Even small differences in population doubling times drastically affect outcomes.
  2. Speed is Critical: Faster-than-light (FTL) speeds enable rapid expansion; slower speeds severely limit reach.
  3. Habitability Constrains Expansion: The fraction of habitable planets directly limits colonization potential.
  4. Humanity’s Reach: Over 500 years, humanity could plausibly colonize hundreds of star systems and reach hundreds of light-years from Earth.

This framework highlights the immense potential—and challenges—of interstellar expansion.

You’re absolutely right to critique the assumptions and refine the model—this is how we arrive at more realistic projections. Let’s address your points systematically:

1. Adjusting for Pre-Screening of Star Systems

You’re correct that colony ships and trade ships wouldn’t waste time visiting star systems without planets suitable for colonization. This means the “failure rate” (visiting a star system with no viable planets) should be much lower than in the initial calculations.

Revised Failure Rates:

This adjustment increases the efficiency of colonization efforts, meaning fewer wasted trips and faster expansion.

2. Accounting for Acceleration/Deceleration Phases

The inclusion of acceleration/deceleration phases significantly impacts travel times. Here’s how it changes the math:

Travel Time Breakdown:

Round-Trip Times:

This adjustment slightly reduces the number of stars visited per ship over 500 years, but it makes the model more realistic.

3. Social, Economic, and Political Factors

These factors are critical but difficult to quantify directly. However, they can be represented indirectly through adjustments to efficiency rates, delays, or constraints on ship production. Here are some examples:

Alien Lifeforms:

Social/Economic Crises:

Political Reasons:

Revised Calculations

Let’s update the calculations based on these refinements.

Travel Efficiency:

Success Rates:

Total Stars Colonized:

Population Growth:

Distance Reached:

Final Revised Summary

| Scenario | Stars Colonized | Population | Distance Reached |
|————–|———————|—————-|———————–|
| Pessimistic | ~234 | ~489 million | ~130 LY |
| General | ~267 | ~3.94 billion | ~190 LY |
| Optimistic | ~297 | ~32.4 billion | ~240 LY |

Addressing Alien Life

If mid-level alien life is discovered in 10–20% of systems, colonization rates drop further:

This highlights the immense ethical and logistical challenges posed by alien encounters.

Key Takeaways

  1. Pre-Screening Matters: Filtering out unsuitable systems drastically improves efficiency.
  2. Acceleration/Deceleration Adds Realism: Including these phases better reflects the physics of interstellar travel.
  3. Social Factors Are Critical: Alien life, political disputes, and crises significantly impact outcomes.

Your point about alien life is especially valid—it introduces profound uncertainties that no model can fully capture. Humanity’s response to such discoveries would redefine the trajectory of colonization.

To determine how many settlers leave Earth versus those who depart from other star systems, we need to break down the colonization process into two distinct phases:

  1. Phase 1: Departure from Earth
    • This includes all colony ships and settlers sent directly from Earth during the initial expansion phase.
  2. Phase 2: Departure from Colonized Stars
    • Once colonies mature (typically after ~100 years), they begin producing their own colony ships and settlers, contributing to further expansion.

The key difference between these phases is that settlers leaving Earth are limited by the resources and infrastructure of a single planet, while settlers departing from colonized stars benefit from exponential growth across multiple systems.

Key Assumptions

  1. Earth’s Contribution:
    • Earth starts with 3 colony ships, each carrying ~1,500 settlers.
    • Trade ships also carry settlers (~50 per ship).
    • Earth’s contributions taper off as colonies mature and take over the expansion effort.
  2. Colonized Star Contributions:
    • Colonies older than 100 years produce 1 colony ship per year, each carrying ~1,500 settlers.
    • Trade ships from established colonies also contribute settlers (~50 per ship).
  3. Population Growth:
    • Colonies grow exponentially, doubling every ~30–40 years depending on the scenario.
    • Each mature colony produces settlers at a much higher rate than Earth alone.
  4. Travel Times:
    • Round-trip times for colony ships vary based on speed assumptions (5–8 years round trip).

Calculations

Phase 1: Settlers Leaving Earth

Phase 2: Settlers Leaving Colonized Stars

Once colonies mature (after ~100 years), they begin producing settlers at an accelerating rate. Here’s the breakdown:

  1. Colony Ship Production:
    • A mature colony produces 1 colony ship per year, each carrying ~1,500 settlers.
    • By year 500, there are ~200–300 colonized stars (depending on the scenario).
    • Total colony ships produced by year 500:
      • Pessimistic: $ 200 \times 400 = 80,000 $ ships.
      • General: $ 267 \times 400 = 106,800 $ ships.
      • Optimistic: $ 297 \times 400 = 118,800 $ ships.
    • Total settlers from colony ships:
      • Pessimistic: $ 80,000 \times 1,500 = 120 million $.
      • General: $ 106,800 \times 1,500 = 160.2 million $.
      • Optimistic: $ 118,800 \times 1,500 = 178.2 million $.
  2. Trade Ship Contributions:
    • Trade ships from colonies also increase linearly.
    • By year 400, colonies collectively operate ~50 trade ships per colonized star.
    • Total trade ships:
      • Pessimistic: $ 200 \times 50 = 10,000 $.
      • General: $ 267 \times 50 = 13,350 $.
      • Optimistic: $ 297 \times 50 = 14,850 $.
    • Settlers from trade ships:
      • Pessimistic: $ 10,000 \times 50 = 500,000 $.
      • General: $ 13,350 \times 50 = 667,500 $.
      • Optimistic: $ 14,850 \times 50 = 742,500 $.
  3. Total Settlers from Colonized Stars:
    • Pessimistic: $ 120M + 0.5M = 120.5M $.
    • General: $ 160.2M + 0.667M = 160.867M $.
    • Optimistic: $ 178.2M + 0.742M = 178.942M $.

Comparison: Earth vs. Colonized Stars

Scenario Settlers from Earth Settlers from Colonized Stars Ratio (Colonized : Earth)
Pessimistic ~707,000 ~120.5 million ~170:1
General ~707,000 ~160.9 million ~227:1
Optimistic ~707,000 ~178.9 million ~253:1

Key Insights

  1. Earth’s Role Diminishes Quickly:
    • Earth contributes only ~0.5% of total settlers by year 500, even in optimistic scenarios.
    • The vast majority of settlers come from mature colonies, reflecting the exponential growth of interstellar civilizations.
  2. Exponential Growth Dominates:
    • Once colonies reach critical mass (~100 years), they become self-sustaining hubs of expansion, dwarfing Earth’s contributions.
  3. Trade Ships Play a Minor Role:
    • While trade ships contribute settlers, their impact is small compared to dedicated colony ships.

Final Answer

By year 500:

Thus, settlers from colonized stars outnumber those from Earth by a factor of ~170–250, emphasizing the dominance of decentralized expansion over centralized Earth-based efforts.

You’re absolutely right to point out that the earlier calculations didn’t account for the fact that Earth’s emigration wouldn’t remain static over time. As colony ships from nearby star systems mature and begin contributing to expansion, they could also facilitate Earth’s continued emigration by transporting settlers from Earth to distant systems. This dynamic interaction between Earth and early colonies would indeed increase the total number of settlers originating from Earth.

Let’s revisit and refine the model to incorporate these factors:

Key Adjustments

  1. Earth’s Emigration via Nearby Colonies:
    • Early colonies (within ~50–100 LY of Earth) act as intermediaries, sending colony ships back to Earth to pick up additional settlers.
    • These ships effectively extend Earth’s reach, allowing more people to leave Earth than Earth alone could manage with its limited ship production.
  2. Dynamic Contribution from Nearby Colonies:
    • Colonies closer to Earth contribute disproportionately to Earth’s emigration efforts, especially during the first 200–300 years when Earth’s own ship production is still ramping up.
  3. Recalculating Earth’s Total Settlers:
    • Instead of assuming Earth sends only its own colony ships (~707,000 settlers), we now include settlers transported by nearby colonies’ ships.
  4. Colony Ship Production Near Earth:
    • Nearby colonies produce ships at a higher rate during their peak (~4–5 ships/year/system after ~200 years).
    • A significant fraction of these ships return to Earth to transport settlers outward.

Revised Calculations

Phase 1: Earth’s Direct Contributions

Phase 2: Earth’s Indirect Contributions via Nearby Colonies

Now, let’s calculate how many additional settlers Earth contributes indirectly through colony ships sent by nearby systems.

  1. Number of Nearby Colonies:
    • Within ~100 LY of Earth: ~20–30 systems colonized within the first 200 years.
    • These systems act as hubs for Earth’s emigration.
  2. Ship Production from Nearby Colonies:
    • Each nearby colony system produces ~1–5 ships/year (depending on age).
    • Over 500 years, each system produces an average of ~1,200 ships (as calculated earlier).
    • Total ships from nearby colonies: $ 25 \times 1,200 = 30,000 $.
  3. Fraction of Ships Returning to Earth:
    • Assume 30–50% of nearby colonies’ ships return to Earth to transport settlers outward.
    • Ships returning to Earth: $ 30,000 \times 0.4 = 12,000 $.
  4. Settlers Transported by Nearby Colonies’ Ships:
    • Each ship carries ~1,500 settlers → $ 12,000 \times 1,500 = 18 million $.

Total Settlers from Earth

Phase 3: Settlers from All Colonized Stars

The total settlers from all colonized stars remain largely unchanged, but we can now compare it to Earth’s revised contributions.

  1. Settlers from Colonized Stars:
    • Pessimistic: ~360.5 million.
    • General: ~481.3 million.
    • Optimistic: ~535.3 million.
  2. Ratio (Colonized Stars : Earth):
    • Pessimistic: $ 360.5M : 18.7M \approx 19:1 $.
    • General: $ 481.3M : 18.7M \approx 26:1 $.
    • Optimistic: $ 535.3M : 18.7M \approx 29:1 $.

Key Insights

  1. Earth’s Role Increases Significantly:
    • By leveraging colony ships from nearby systems, Earth’s contribution rises from ~707,000 to ~18.7 million settlers—still small compared to the total but far more substantial than before.
  2. Nearby Colonies Act as Force Multipliers:
    • Early colonies near Earth play a critical role in extending Earth’s reach, effectively acting as intermediaries for Earth’s emigration.
  3. Decentralization Still Dominates:
    • Despite Earth’s increased contribution, the vast majority of settlers (~95%) still come from colonized stars, reflecting the decentralized nature of interstellar expansion.

Final Answer

By year 500:

Thus, settlers from colonized stars outnumber those from Earth by a factor of ~19–29, even after accounting for Earth’s increased contributions via nearby colonies.

This refined model better captures the dynamic interplay between Earth and its early colonies, highlighting the importance of nearby systems in facilitating Earth’s continued emigration.

Yes, that is an excellent and plausible conclusion. Earth primarily acts as the initial “floodgate” for population growth within its own solar system (the Sun’s solar-plane), rather than being the direct or primary source of interstellar settlers over the 500–900 years of expansion. Here’s why this assumption aligns with the dynamics of population growth, logistics, and colonization:

1. Earth’s Role in Population Growth

Thus, Earth’s primary contribution is filling its solar-plane with a population that later fuels interstellar expansion.

2. Transition to Interstellar Expansion

3. Final Numbers

Let’s summarize the key figures:

Population Growth in Earth’s Solar-Plane

Settlers Leaving Earth’s Solar-Plane

Settlers from Colonized Stars

4. Key Insights

  1. Earth’s Solar-Plane as the Foundation:
    Earth’s primary role is to populate its own solar system, creating a stable base from which interstellar colonization can occur. This “flooding” of the solar-plane ensures a large, self-sustaining population capable of supporting long-term expansion.

  2. Nearby Colonies as Force Multipliers:
    Early colonies near Earth act as hubs, amplifying Earth’s ability to send settlers outward. However, their own populations quickly surpass Earth’s contributions.

  3. Decentralized Expansion:
    Once colonization begins in earnest, the process becomes decentralized. Older colonies take over as the primary drivers of expansion, with Earth playing a diminishing role.

  4. Earth’s Legacy:
    While Earth is not the main source of settlers beyond the first few centuries, it remains the cultural, technological, and biological origin point of humanity’s interstellar civilization. Its solar-plane serves as the initial staging ground for humanity’s leap to the stars.

Final Conclusion

By year 500:

Thus, Earth’s primary legacy is flooding its solar-plane with a massive population, which then acts as the foundation for humanity’s interstellar expansion. This dynamic reflects the shift from centralized growth (Earth-focused) to decentralized expansion (colony-driven), ensuring humanity’s survival and spread across the galaxy.